Stay Current:
Pediatric Surgery—there's an app for that!
Find a customizable feed of newly released articles from the leading pediatric surgery journals right at your fingertips. Explore the articles our editors and your colleagues are talking about. Discover podcasts with expert discussions on hot topics in the field. Search our vast multimedia library to find articles, reviews, lectures, technique videos, infographics, guidelines, and podcasts. CME credit is available for select content. Presented by Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Children's Mercy Hospital, in partnership with Journal of Pediatric Surgery.
Available on the AppStore Get it on Google PlayWelcome!
Back to Guidelines
Implementing an early feeding pathway post gastrostomy insertion reduces inpatient stay
Background
There is no consensus regarding optimal postoperative feeding strategy following gastrostomy insertion in children. The aim of this study was to determine whether implementing an early postoperative feeding pathway reduces length of stay (LOS) without increasing complications.
Methods
A retrospective case note review of all children having a new gastrostomy inserted during a one-year period prior to (July 2016–July 2017) and following (July 2017–July 2018) pathway introduction was performed. Children unable to follow the pathway for coexisting medical or nutritional reasons were excluded. The pathway comprised feeding 50% of normal feed 2 hours postprocedure, followed by 100% of normal feed at 5 and 8 h. Previously, patients were fed postoperatively according to surgeon preference.
Results
116 cases met inclusion criteria, 55 prior to and 61 after pathway implementation. Children following the early feeding pathway had a shorter postoperative LOS than the historical group (median 28 vs 33 h, p < 0.003), while immediate (<72 h) and early (<30 day) complication rates were similar (8.2 vs 7.3%, p = 1.00 and 12 vs 16%, p = 0.59, respectively).
Conclusions
Early postoperative feeding after gastrostomy insertion is safe and reduces LOS.
Type of study
Quality improvement.
Level of evidence
III